Why the leaders who build something that lasts make decisions for five years from now, not just for today. By Bobby McGraw, Founder of The Becoming Company and Executive Coach Publisher Checklist SEO Title Tag: Think Long Term as a Leader: Why Five Year Decisions Beat Quick Wins Meta Description: Mo
*Why the leaders who build something that lasts make decisions for five years from now, not just for today.*
By Bobby McGraw, Founder of The Becoming Company and Executive Coach
---
I recorded a short leadership message for our team not long ago, and the line that stuck with me afterward wasn't the one I planned to say. It was this one: pro leaders plant trees they will never sit under.
Here's the short answer to the question in the title. You become a leader who thinks long term by making one decision at a time based on where you want to be in five years, not on what would feel good today. That's it. It's not a personality trait some leaders are born with and others aren't. It's a decision you practice, over and over, until it becomes how you naturally think.
The rest of this is about why that's harder than it sounds, and what it actually looks like to build the habit.
Key Takeaways
- Most leadership mistakes don't come from bad judgment. They come from decisions made too fast, in service of something that felt urgent but wasn't actually important.
- Quick wins are tempting because they're visible and provable. Long-term investments, in people and culture, rarely show results in the same quarter you make them.
- Research consistently shows that leaders who manage for the long term, and who develop the people around them, outperform leaders who optimize for this quarter.
- The shift isn't about thinking bigger. It's about thinking longer, and it starts with one decision, not a five-year plan.
- Pro leaders spend less energy growing fruit on their own tree and more energy growing fruit on someone else's.
Why Do We Keep Making the Same Short-Term Mistakes?
Here's what I keep coming back to. A lot of the mistakes I look back on didn't come from a lack of effort or intelligence. They came from a decision I made too fast, because I wanted the win now.
I get it. Everybody wants quick wins. They're visible. They're easy to point to in a review. They make you feel like you're moving. Meanwhile, the decisions that actually matter, the ones that build culture and develop people, rarely show results in the same quarter you make them. So we default to what we can measure this week, even when we know better.
The tension is real, and it doesn't go away just because you name it. You still have a shop to run, a team to lead, a P&L to answer for. But if we're not careful, we start mistaking motion for progress. We confuse the fastest decision in the room with the right one.
What Does the Research Actually Say About Long-Term Leadership?
This isn't just a nice idea. There's real evidence that thinking longer changes outcomes, both for the people you lead and for the results you're chasing.
A McKinsey Global Institute analysis built what it called a Corporate Horizon Index, scoring large public companies on how consistently they invested and managed for the long term rather than for the next quarter's numbers. The firms that scored as genuinely long-term oriented saw meaningfully stronger revenue and earnings growth than their short-term-focused peers over more than a decade of tracking, with less volatility along the way. In plain terms: leaders who resisted the pressure to optimize for today built companies that performed better over time, not worse.
Gallup's long-running workplace research, based on tracking millions of employees, has found that the manager, not the company, not the pay, not the mission statement, accounts for roughly 70 percent of the variance in how engaged a team is. That's a staggering number. It means the single biggest lever you have as a leader isn't a program or a policy. It's whether you're actually developing the people in front of you, which is a long-term investment that never shows up on this week's dashboard.
And here's the one that should bother every leader reading this: research on succession planning has repeatedly found that only a small fraction of organizations, often cited around one in seven, have an actual leadership succession strategy in place. Most leaders are, functionally, planning to be irreplaceable. Not because they say that out loud, but because they never got around to building anyone who could stand in the gap.
Put those three together and a pattern emerges. The leaders who think long term outperform financially, build teams that are more engaged, and leave behind something that survives them. The leaders who don't tend to win the week and lose the decade.
The Pro Leader Shift: Growing Fruit on Someone Else's Tree
Here's the reframe I keep teaching, because it's the one that actually changes behavior instead of just sounding good in a meeting.
Most leaders spend their energy growing fruit on their own tree. That's not a character flaw. It's the default. You get rewarded for what you personally produce, so you optimize for that. But pro leaders make a quiet, deliberate shift. They start spending their energy growing fruit on someone else's tree, developing a leader who will outlast their own tenure, building a culture that holds up whether they're in the room or not, handing off things they could have kept for themselves.
That's the whole idea behind pro leaders plant trees they will never sit under. You're not doing the work because you'll get to enjoy the shade. You're doing it because somebody will, someday, and that was always the point.
What Does This Actually Look Like Day to Day?
This is where it stops being a nice thought and starts being a practice. Here's what I've seen work, both in my own leadership and in coaching leaders who are trying to build this muscle.
It starts with a question, not a plan. You don't need a five-year strategic document to think longer. You need to ask one honest question before your next real decision: am I making this call for today's convenience, or for the leader, team, and culture I want in five years? Most of the time, the answer changes what you do.
It shows up in who gets your best attention. Leaders who think short term give their best energy to the fire in front of them. Leaders who think long term give some of that energy, on purpose, to developing the person who could eventually put out that fire without them. That might mean slowing down to explain the why instead of just fixing it yourself. It might mean handing off something you're genuinely better at, because someone else needs the practice more than you need the efficiency.
It shows up in what you're willing to not get credit for. Growing fruit on someone else's tree means someone else eventually gets to stand under it. If that bothers you, that's worth sitting with honestly. It bothered me too, longer than I'd like to admit.
Practical Steps to Start Thinking Longer This Week
You don't need a retreat or a new framework to start. You need a handful of honest practices, repeated consistently.
- Name the decision you're avoiding thinking clearly about. There's usually one, a hire, a hard conversation, a project you're hoarding. Write it down before you do anything else.
- Ask the five-year question out loud. For that decision, ask: what does the thirty-day version of this look like, and what does the five-year version look like? If they're different decisions, you've been solving for the wrong timeline.
- Pick one thing you're currently doing that someone else should be learning to do. Not because you're bad at it. Because you being the only one who can do it is a long-term liability disguised as a short-term strength.
- Schedule the handoff, don't just intend it. Put an actual date on the calendar for when you'll start transferring that responsibility. Intentions without dates rarely survive a busy week.
- Debrief what you built, not just what you finished. At the end of each week, ask what you built that will still matter in five years, alongside what you finished that mattered today. Both questions deserve an answer.
- Find one tree you're willing to plant that you won't get to sit under. It could be a person, a system, a piece of culture. Name it specifically, and take one step toward it this week.
- Repeat the five-year question on your next decision. This isn't a one-time exercise. It's the habit that builds the leader.
Frequently Asked Questions
Isn't thinking long term just a luxury for leaders who aren't under financial pressure? No. The research points the other way. Leaders and organizations that manage for the long term tend to show stronger, steadier financial performance over time than those chasing short-term wins, precisely because they're not constantly reacting to avoidable fires.
How do I balance long-term thinking with the real deadlines I have this week? You don't have to choose one or the other for every decision. Ask the five-year question specifically on decisions that shape people, culture, or systems, not on every routine task. Most of your week can stay tactical. A handful of decisions deserve the longer lens.
What if I don't have anyone to develop right now? Start smaller than you think. Developing someone can mean giving one person more context, more ownership, or more of the "why" behind a decision this month. You don't need a formal program to start growing fruit on someone else's tree.
Isn't it selfish to think about your own five-year future as a leader? This isn't about your five-year future. It's about the five-year future of the people, culture, and impact you're responsible for. The tree you plant isn't for you. That's the whole point of the metaphor.
How do I know if I'm actually making progress on this, or just telling myself I am? Look for outward evidence, not internal feelings. Are there people on your team who could step into more responsibility today than they could a year ago? Is there anything running well that doesn't require you personally? That's the real scoreboard.
The Trees You'll Never Sit Under
I'll end where I started. Pro leaders plant trees they will never sit under.
The tree you plant this year isn't going to shade you. That's not a flaw in the plan. That's the plan. Somewhere in your own story is a person who made a decision that never paid them back directly, a mentor who took a call they didn't have to take, a leader who handed you an opportunity before you'd earned it. You're living proof that it worked.
So here's the challenge, the same one I gave our team. Don't try to solve the next five years today. Just make one decision, right now, not based on where you are, but based on where you want to be in five years. Let that answer decide.
About the Author
Bobby McGraw is the founder and president of The Becoming Company, an ACC-credentialed executive coaching practice focused on emotional intelligence and intentional leadership. He serves as lead trainer at the Middle Way Institute and works with both for-profit executives and nonprofit leaders to build leadership that lasts beyond any single season. He is co-author of *Grow Your Faith: A Little Guide to Bigger Faith*.
- Most leadership mistakes don't come from bad judgment. They come from decisions made too fast, in service of something that felt urgent but wasn't actually important.
- Quick wins are tempting because they're visible and provable. Long-term investments, in people and culture, rarely show results in the same quarter you make them.
- Research consistently shows that leaders who manage for the long term, and who develop the people around them, outperform leaders who optimize for this quarter.
- The shift isn't about thinking bigger. It's about thinking longer, and it starts with one decision, not a five-year plan.
- Pro leaders spend less energy growing fruit on their own tree and more energy growing fruit on someone else's.
Isn't thinking long term just a luxury for leaders who aren't under financial pressure?
No. The research points the other way. Leaders and organizations that manage for the long term tend to show stronger, steadier financial performance over time than those chasing short-term wins, precisely because they're not constantly reacting to avoidable fires.
How do I balance long-term thinking with the real deadlines I have this week?
You don't have to choose one or the other for every decision. Ask the five-year question specifically on decisions that shape people, culture, or systems, not on every routine task. Most of your week can stay tactical. A handful of decisions deserve the longer lens.
What if I don't have anyone to develop right now?
Start smaller than you think. Developing someone can mean giving one person more context, more ownership, or more of the "why" behind a decision this month. You don't need a formal program to start growing fruit on someone else's tree.
Isn't it selfish to think about your own five-year future as a leader?
This isn't about your five-year future. It's about the five-year future of the people, culture, and impact you're responsible for. The tree you plant isn't for you. That's the whole point of the metaphor.
How do I know if I'm actually making progress on this, or just telling myself I am?
Look for outward evidence, not internal feelings. Are there people on your team who could step into more responsibility today than they could a year ago? Is there anything running well that doesn't require you personally? That's the real scoreboard.
Bobby McGraw is a leadership coach, keynote speaker, and organizational leadership practitioner. Explore leadership coaching, speaking and workshops, or Bobby's background.
