← All leadership articles
Leadership

How Do You Build Confidence In Your Team Before They've Proven Themselves?

Most people are carrying more potential than confidence, and the leaders who close that gap say something before the proof shows up, not after. By Bobby McGraw, Founder of The Becoming Co.

September 20261 min read
The short answer

Most people are carrying more potential than confidence, and the leaders who close that gap say something before the proof shows up, not after. By Bobby McGraw, Founder of The Becoming Co.

*Most people are carrying more potential than confidence, and the leaders who close that gap say something before the proof shows up, not after.*

By Bobby McGraw, Founder of The Becoming Co.

---

I've noticed something over the years of coaching leaders. People don't just grow because someone gave them feedback. They grow because someone believed in them.

If you want to build confidence in your team before they've proven themselves, here's the short answer: stop waiting for the win to say something. Most people are walking around with more potential than they have confidence, and the leaders who close that gap are the ones who name what they see in someone early, specifically, and out loud, before the results confirm it.

That's not a soft skill you sprinkle on top of good management. It's one of the more overlooked levers a leader has. The research backs it up, and so does almost everyone's own story, if you think back far enough. Somebody believed in you before you'd earned it. That belief did something no amount of feedback could have done on its own.

The rest of this is about how to actually do that, on purpose, with the people you lead.

Key Takeaways

  • Confidence in a team usually lags behind potential, and belief spoken early is what closes that gap.
  • Waiting until someone succeeds to affirm them means the belief arrives after it's needed, not before.
  • The Pygmalion effect and decades of Gallup research both point to the same thing: a leader's expressed expectations shape performance, not just judge it.
  • Specific, early affirmation works. Vague praise after the fact does not.
  • The practical shift is small: name what you see in someone before it's confirmed, and let them grow into it.

Why Do Leaders Wait Too Long To Encourage Their Team?

Here's the tension. Most leaders think encouragement has to be earned first. Somebody does good work, then you tell them it was good. It feels responsible. It feels honest. You're not just handing out praise for nothing.

But watch what that does over time. The person who's quietly capable, who's careful, who's asking good questions, doesn't hear anything from you while they're building that capability. They only hear from you once it's already obvious to everybody. By then, your words aren't doing much. They're just confirming what the person and everyone else already knew.

I've done this myself. I've watched somebody grow for months, thought good things about them, and never said it out loud until there was a "reason" to. Looking back, I wasn't being careful. I was being late.

And there's a cost to that timing. The people who are still building confidence, who aren't sure yet if they're actually good at this, are the ones who need to hear it most. If the only thing they get from you is silence until they've already proven it, you've essentially told them: you're on your own until you figure this out. That's a lonely way to grow, and it's slower than it needs to be.

The tension isn't whether encouragement matters. Every leader already believes that. The tension is timing. We've quietly decided that saying something early feels like a risk, like we might be wrong about someone, like we might set them up to fail if we say it too soon. So we wait for proof. And the wait is the problem.

What Does The Research Say About Belief And Performance?

There's real research behind why this matters more than it might seem.

In 1965, psychologists Robert Rosenthal and Lenore Jacobson ran a study in an elementary school that became one of the most cited findings in psychology. Teachers were told that certain students, chosen at random, were likely to be "bloomers" who'd show real growth that year. The students weren't actually different from their classmates. But by the end of the year, they'd shown significantly greater gains than their peers, simply because their teachers expected more from them and treated them accordingly. It's called the Pygmalion effect, and it's held up in study after study since.

What's most useful for leaders is that it doesn't stay in the classroom. Tel Aviv University professor Dov Eden spent years demonstrating the same effect in workplaces, across industries and sectors. When a manager holds and communicates real positive expectations for someone, that person's own self-expectations rise, their effort rises, and their performance follows. Eden's research also found the reverse: when a leader expects a team to struggle, performance tends to decline too. The belief isn't neutral. It's doing something either way.

Gallup's research points to the same conclusion from a different direction. Their long-running analysis of workplace engagement has found that managers account for roughly 70 percent of the variance in team engagement. Not compensation. Not perks. Not the mission statement on the wall. The manager, and specifically how that manager shows up day to day, explains most of the difference between a team that's engaged and a team that isn't.

And timing matters as much as the words themselves. O.C. Tanner's research on workplace recognition found that recognition has the most impact when it happens within about 24 hours of the behavior it's responding to, not weeks later in a review. The same research found that nearly 8 in 10 employees who voluntarily left a job pointed to a lack of recognition as a primary reason. People don't just want to be told they did well eventually. They want it named while it's happening, close enough to the moment that it actually shapes what they believe about themselves.

Put together, the evidence says something simple: belief expressed early and specifically doesn't just make people feel good. It changes what they're capable of.

The Confidence Gap: A Different Way To Think About It

Here's what I keep coming back to. Most leadership training treats affirmation like a reward system. Do the thing, then get the praise. That's not wrong, exactly, but it's incomplete, and it puts the belief in the wrong place in the sequence.

I've started thinking about it as a confidence gap instead of a performance gap. Most people aren't short on ability nearly as often as we assume. They're short on somebody naming what's already there before they've fully trusted it themselves. Feedback tells someone what they did. Belief tells them who they are, and who they're capable of becoming.

That's the shift. Not "wait and see, then respond." Instead: notice early, name it specifically, and say it before it's confirmed. You're not guessing at potential that isn't there. You're speaking to potential you can already see, before the proof catches up to it.

What Belief-First Leadership Actually Looks Like

I try to build this into how I coach leaders now, because it's easy to agree with in theory and easy to skip in practice.

The shift I ask leaders to make is simple to describe and a little uncomfortable to actually do: pick someone you've been meaning to encourage, and don't wait for the moment to feel earned. Say something specific about what you already see in them, before they've delivered the thing that would "justify" it.

This isn't about empty praise. Vague encouragement doesn't do much. "Good job" or "you're doing great" is easy to say and easy to forget. What actually lands is specific. "I see the way you handled that conversation without getting defensive." "I see leadership in how you carry pressure when things get chaotic." That kind of language names something real, something the person may not have fully claimed about themselves yet, and it gives them something to grow into.

I've watched this work in coaching relationships more than once. A leader I work with had someone on his team who was clearly more capable than her role reflected, but nobody had said so directly. He named it specifically, in a conversation that had nothing to do with a performance review, just an honest observation about what he'd noticed. Within a few months, her confidence and her output both shifted, not because her skills had changed overnight, but because someone had finally said out loud what she'd been unsure was true.

That's the practical core of belief-first leadership: you're not manufacturing confidence out of nothing. You're naming what's real, earlier than feels comfortable, so the person doesn't have to wait for proof to start believing it too.

How To Start Encouraging Your Team Before They Succeed

Here's how to actually put this into practice this week.

  1. Pick one person before you pick a moment. Don't wait for the "right time." Think of someone on your team you've noticed but haven't said anything to yet, and start there.
  1. Get specific about what you actually see. Skip "good job." Name the behavior, the character trait, or the capability you've noticed. "I see how you handle pressure" beats "nice work" every time.
  1. Say it before it's confirmed, not after. If you're waiting to see if this holds up over a few more months before you say anything, you're already too late. Say it now, while it still requires something from you to say it.
  1. Choose the medium that fits the relationship. A text, a call, or a quick word in person all work. The format matters less than the timing and the specificity.
  1. Don't attach a request. This isn't the moment to also ask for more output or bring up what still needs work. Let the belief stand on its own.
  1. Watch for the pattern, not just the moment. Once you start naming what you see in people early, you'll notice it becomes a habit that changes how your whole team operates, not just a one-time gesture.
  1. Circle back later, briefly. A few weeks after you've said something, a short follow-up ("still see it") reinforces that it wasn't a one-time compliment. It was real.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Pygmalion effect in leadership? The Pygmalion effect describes how a leader's expectations of someone shape that person's actual performance. First documented by Rosenthal and Jacobson in a 1965 classroom study, it's since been replicated in workplaces by researchers like Dov Eden, showing that expressed belief in someone's ability tends to raise their real performance over time.

Isn't it risky to encourage someone before they've actually proven themselves? It can feel that way, but the research suggests the opposite risk is bigger. Waiting until someone has already proven themselves means your words confirm what's already obvious instead of shaping what's still forming. Specific, early belief tends to raise performance rather than set someone up to fail.

What's the difference between feedback and belief? Feedback tells someone what they did, usually after the fact. Belief tells someone who they are and what they're capable of, often before it's fully proven. Both matter, but belief is the one most leaders skip, and it's often the one that changes how someone shows up next.

How often should a leader affirm their team? Gallup's research suggests weekly recognition keeps engagement meaningfully higher than infrequent recognition, and O.C. Tanner's research shows recognition lands hardest within about 24 hours of the behavior. Frequent and timely beats occasional and delayed, even when the words themselves are simple.

What if I don't know what to say? Start with something true and specific you've actually noticed, not a generic compliment. Name a behavior, a way someone handled a hard moment, or a capability you see forming. It doesn't need to be eloquent. It needs to be specific and said before you're sure it's "earned."

The Belief You Never Said Out Loud

Think back for a second, to somebody in your life who believed in you before you believed in yourself. Maybe it was a parent, a coach, a teacher, a boss early in your career. They didn't wait for you to prove it first. They said it while you were still becoming it, and that belief probably did something no amount of advice ever could.

You have that same chance with somebody right now. Somebody on your team, in your family, in your life, who's carrying more potential than confidence, waiting on someone to say it out loud before they're sure it's true.

Don't wait for the moment to feel earned. Text them. Call them. Say it in person if you can. Tell them exactly what you see, what could be, what should be.

You never know how much that might unlock. Somebody has to move first. Why not you?

---

Keep Learning

*This is the first pillar post in this series on The Becoming Co. site. As more related articles are published, links to posts on giving feedback, leading through uncertainty, and building trust on a team will go here.*

Key takeaways
  • Confidence in a team usually lags behind potential, and belief spoken early is what closes that gap.
  • Waiting until someone succeeds to affirm them means the belief arrives after it's needed, not before.
  • The Pygmalion effect and decades of Gallup research both point to the same thing: a leader's expressed expectations shape performance, not just judge it.
  • Specific, early affirmation works. Vague praise after the fact does not.
  • The practical shift is small: name what you see in someone before it's confirmed, and let them grow into it.
Frequently asked questions

What is the Pygmalion effect in leadership?

The Pygmalion effect describes how a leader's expectations of someone shape that person's actual performance. First documented by Rosenthal and Jacobson in a 1965 classroom study, it's since been replicated in workplaces by researchers like Dov Eden, showing that expressed belief in someone's ability tends to raise their real performance over time.

Isn't it risky to encourage someone before they've actually proven themselves?

It can feel that way, but the research suggests the opposite risk is bigger. Waiting until someone has already proven themselves means your words confirm what's already obvious instead of shaping what's still forming. Specific, early belief tends to raise performance rather than set someone up to fail.

What's the difference between feedback and belief?

Feedback tells someone what they did, usually after the fact. Belief tells someone who they are and what they're capable of, often before it's fully proven. Both matter, but belief is the one most leaders skip, and it's often the one that changes how someone shows up next.

How often should a leader affirm their team?

Gallup's research suggests weekly recognition keeps engagement meaningfully higher than infrequent recognition, and O.C. Tanner's research shows recognition lands hardest within about 24 hours of the behavior. Frequent and timely beats occasional and delayed, even when the words themselves are simple.

What if I don't know what to say?

Start with something true and specific you've actually noticed, not a generic compliment. Name a behavior, a way someone handled a hard moment, or a capability you see forming. It doesn't need to be eloquent. It needs to be specific and said before you're sure it's "earned."

About the author

is a leadership coach, keynote speaker, and organizational leadership practitioner. Explore leadership coaching, speaking and workshops, or Bobby's background.